GillardGate: the Lefty luvvies are getting really nasty today
Take this from the Courier Mail’s (a Murdoch rag, ha!) Paul Syvret. The bloke is frothing at the mouth.
First it starts with a picture-tells-1000-words cartoon of a menacing Opposition Leader Tony Abbott flinging mud… conveniently forgetting the fact the actual allegations themselves have come from those on the Left, including former Labor Attorney General and current labor MP Robert McClelland as well as AWU heavyweights such as Bob Kernohan and former AWU national secretary Ian Cambridge who was even made a judge by Gillard. And let’s not forget half of this can’o'worms was opened by none other than major Lefty lawyer Harry Nowicki!
But no. Syvret kicks in the boot foam thong elsewhere.
LARRY Pickering. James Ashby. Godwin Grech.
And then… hints! Oooo booga booga!
Yep. Never mind the cases surrounding or linked to each man are completely separate from each other, good ol’ Paul conveniently links them together.
Must be a vast right wing conspiracy.
Is there nothing funnier than the paranoid fact-free, leftist mind when backed into a corner??
Some other apologist – ahh, yes, another Courier Mail luvvie, Dennis Atkins, went and called Larry Pickering a “soft-porn cartoonist”.
But we should probably mellow the harshy on Atkins and Syvret. After all, despite their best efforts, the QLD ALP has been reduced to a mere seven seats.
Meh, no. Not when crap like Syrvet’s muck-racking is being passed off as reasoned opinion.
The little grub has had the hide to bring up stuff from the past that actually WAS cleared (laughed out of town, thrown out of court, resolved) and then has the hide to attest to the following:
But it would be grubby to dredge up old and unsubstantiated smears of decades past like that purely to smear a political opponent wouldn’t it?
Yes, Paul. I guess it would be.
A [Labor] document calls on staffers to find details on their opponents’ “younger days”…
That’s gotta smart every morning…
The bloke is clutching at straw man arguments, and is a total, desperate hypocrite.
And who should Paul really be all pissy pants at? The people he attacked or perhaps, some other folks?
Poor Paul. Still hasn’t got it that this isn’t a left/right issue; that maybe it’s a few on the left trying to save the once proud ALP from destruction.
PS Conveniently, they’ve turned off comments for legal reasons, and with the way things are, that can be understood… however Paul Syvret sounds like someone who’d have turned them off anyway.
And yet even lower the desperate stoop.
Sexist, racist, homophobic, religious nut, zealot, etc. etc…
What other BWAHAism can these fools come up with?