Well, well. Our artists turn sceptic
Whoda thunk d’artists would put on a play with a climate sceptic as the hero?
Posts Tagged ‘ Climategate ’
Whoda thunk d’artists would put on a play with a climate sceptic as the hero?
Probably because the work of the world’s “top” climate scientists isn’t really that scholarly.
Climategate, both 1 and 2, are textbook cases of gross lapses in professional ethics and scientific malfeasance. To understand why, one must first understand what science is and how it is supposed to operate. Science is the noble pursuit of knowledge through observation, testing and experimentation. Scientists attempt to explain, describe and/or predict the implications of phenomena through the use of the scientific method.
…
Which brings us to Climategate. Climategate parts one and two are a series of leaked e-mails from arguably the most prominent researchers promoting the idea that humans are causing catastrophic global warming. The e-mails show the scientists involved to be violating their professional ethics with the result that climate science in particular and science as an institution more generally is brought into question.
With the national ALP conference looming, Tom Quinn, a politics professor at La Trobe University, takes a look at why Labor is fast becoming a shadow of the party it once was.
Rock-bottom support. Plummeting membership. A broken structure. Labor is in trouble and its very existence is at stake. But if the hacks are serious about fixing the party at its national conference this weekend, they must deal with one issue underpinning all of Labor’s woes – the collapse of the party’s traditional base.
While opinion polls this year have hammered home the dire level of support for Labor, with its primary vote often wallowing in the 20s, the party’s main concern is the plummeting number of paid-up members. Official numbers are hard to come by, but insiders report that membership is now below 20,000, the lowest level in decades and half the number the party had as recently as 2007 when Kevin Rudd was elected. The swiftness of this loss is compounded by the changing nature of Australian society, presenting the question of whether numbers can be regained quickly or indeed ever.
The first part of the piece is quite good explaining the downsizing of Labor’s base – manual laborers – coupled with the realisation that the base’s core needs such as free healthcare and education have been met thus pushing those traditional core values towards the cliff of irrelevance.
There are a few sticking points with Quinn’s argument however.
Take Labor’s current approach to asylum seekers. Its strategy is centred on ”tough on refugees” posturing and playing up the threat to national security.
Excuse me, but just how is Labor “tough” on asylum seekers? What? Tough like a shiatsu massage? Just how is closing the offshore processing centres we had that reduced illegal boat arrivals to almost zero which led to a gargantuan spike in arrivals (and deaths at sea) considered “tough”? How is quickly processing illegal arrivals and releasing them on welfare into the community “tough”?
Next, Quinn argues that mirroring the Liberal party won’t bear fruit.
Why choose Liberal-lite when you can vote for the real thing?
Memo to Tom: Kevin Rudd won the 2007 federal election for the ALP precisely by portraying himself as Howard-lite.
Labor is consistently missing the opportunity to build community support for a more progressive Australia, primarily because it no longer understands its former base.
An odd line. I would argue Labor is wallowing in the polls and losing its base precisely because it has become too progressive since winning the 2007 (and 2010) election; Greens-lite if you will.
You can see where this going, right? Just in case “politics academic” didn’t toll the warning bells…
As the impacts of climate change accelerate…
Don’tcha just love how in so many circles, the above phrase is so casually bandied about and accepted without the slightest hint of critique.
Never mind that it hasn’t warmed in about 15 years, and that on average 2011 has been colder than all the other years this century and even cooler that 1988.
Never mind parts of the world experienced their coldest winter in a decade last year.
Never mind sea level rises are actually decelerating from the normal 3mm per year we’ve seen since the end of the little ice age to a mere 1.8mm at the moment.
Never mind the intensity and frequency on average of hurricanes and the like has actually decreased over the past three decades.
Never mind the “endangered” polar bear has seen its numbers increase five-fold, from 5000 to 25,000 since the 1950s and that there are so many now, hunting season is open again.
Never mind changes in the sun’s thermal output.
Never mind the Climategate 1.0 and 2.0 emails.
Never mind reality vs innaccurate models, just repeat the man-made global warming mantra; brainwash the kids with it to the point where you can say “as the impacts of climate change accelerate”, and not an eyelid is batted.
Argh!
But let’s move on to the final fisk…
Trapped between parties of fear and vision, Labor is being squeezed into irrelevance.
So the Liberals are a party of “fear” and the Greens are a party of “vision”. Have I got that right, Tom?
I guess “fear” must be scary stuff like balancing the budget and lowering taxes.
I guess “vision” must entail such luminous ideas taking away freedom of the press and scrapping Australia’s sovereignty by means of a one world undemocratic government.
UPDATE
‘Nuff said.
Tom Quinn has worked for the Green Building Council of Australia for a number of years…
Piece together some key emails from a few “leading” climate scientists and one finds a certain distinct narrative.
It is high time for the manmade climate change “consensus” to start backing up its claims by providing more substantiated evidence to the public, which will be cross-examined by other scientists with a mind to getting to the truth of the matter, rather than simply ratifying the preferences of their political backers. Such would spell the end of the manmade climate change “crisis,” which in any event has been dragging on for decades now, with no discernible apocalypse in sight.
That quote is from RogueOperator who notes a disturbing turn of phrase by the scientists who are supposedly at the forefront of global climate research.
“The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s included and what is left out.”
RogueOperator notes discussions on:
Oh, don’t worry. There’s more.
When scientists are working for a cause, then it ceases to be science.
Almost exactly two years after the first “Climategate” emails were leaked onto the internet, another batch has mysteriously made its way online.
The “climategate” emails highlighted the accepted orthodox of man-made global warming/climate change – the consensus – was actually a small, highly (government) funded cabal of scientists such as Keith Briffa, Michael Mann, and Phil Jones working closely together to fudge data, suppress data, delete data, cherry-pick data, abuse the peer-review process, and attack any scientist who dare question their often secretive work.
And now there’s more; scientists working for “the cause”.
That in itself should ring alarm bells in anyone’s mind.
From whoever leaked the emails: Read more
Via Bolta who has all the details, basically what we have is the editor-in-chief of a prestigious scientific journal, Wolfgang Wagner of Remote Sensing, has resigned because a peer-reviewed paper they published was peer-reviewed by three scientists with at least some scepticism towards the notion that the minor human contribution to a mostly natural yet essential life-enabling trace gas, CO2, is driving dangerous man-made climate change, itself undetectable through empirical testing.
Not that the paper has been proved wrong, far from it, but the small clique of alarmist scientists wasn’t consulted – “consensus” was breached – and now the proverbial has hit the fan.
Details here.
UPDATE
And remember, this comes just days after another group of scientists at CERN were gagged by their boss from interpreting data they collected – data that flies in the face of the “consensus” of course.
Spare me.
This time it’s Martin Parry, currently enjoying a junket on the Gold Coast, who reckons we’ve got to stop global warming to save the refugees.
And who’s Martin Parry? He’s the bloke who chaired the last IPCC report which has subsequently been found to be about as reliable as Al Gore insisting he just wants a sports massage.
BTW, it’s always some place nice where they have these junkets, isn’t it? Bali, the Gold coast… What a con.
Meanwhile, Antarctic sea ice is at a record high and the South Pole has been cooling the last 30 years.

He’s threatening to sue. The No-Cap-and-Trade Coalition tells him to bring it on. And all this over a global warming spoof video.
Washington, DC — Penn State University’s Michael Mann, one of the central figures in the Climategate scandal, has threatened legal action against Minnesotans for Global Warming (M4GW) over the group’s popular satirical YouTube video “Hide the Decline.” The No Cap-and-Trade Coalition, a group that includes M4GW, responded today at an event at the National Press Club, releasing Mann’s threatening letter and an updated version of the “Hide the Decline” video.
Unfortunately, that one’s been blocked, too. Someone’s touchy, heheh.

Yeah right. So just where is all that raw temperature data? And what about the deletion of other data, non-compliance with Freedom of Information requests, deletions of key emails, collusion, and their efforts to “hide the decline” of global average temperatures?
Not suprised British MPs whitewashed this scandal, just as Penn State “cleared” Michael “hockey stick” Mann.though. There’s too much money and benefits rolled up in this nice little earner aka man-made climate change.

UPDATE
Jo Nova has more on this special little relationship between governments and science.
Art Robinson is a rare man. He’s transcended and laid bare a creeping failure in the infrastructure of science over the past 50 years. He describes how government has usurped control of the quest for knowledge from private industry and individuals.
According to Chris Horner of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, three out of the four main temperature data sets in the world are irrevocably corrupted or even fabricated. And NASA’s data set can’t really be used because they took their data from CRU (East Anglia), where this whole Climategate mess began. Not only that, there has been significant collusion between climate scientists and reporters to keep the alarmist message on track.
Heck, it’s being argued that NASA themselves knew their data was poor, but did they tell us that?
Pajamas has a few good articles on this. We also see Lord Monckton having a go at the Nature editorial staff, too.
The once-respected science journal Nature recently published a whining editorial to the effect that climate scientists are not criminals, really; that attacks on them by increasingly-skeptical news media are soooo unfair; and that the fundamental science showing that the planet is doomed unless the economies of the West are shut down at once is unchallengeable.
No doubt most climate scientists are not criminals. However, some are. Many of the two dozen Climategate emailers, who have for years driven the IPCC process, tampered with peer review in the learned journals, and fabricated, altered, concealed, or destroyed scientific data are criminals. Whether they or Nature like it or not, they will eventually stand trial, and deservedly so.
Here’s a neat video, too.
Even some who bought the man-made global warming line must surely be having doubts as to whether to rush in gigantic climate taxes.
*cross-posted at Tizona
The Guardian thinks it might have been him (sorry, can’t link to them at this work computer). He’s had to give a formal statement to the boys in blue, refused to sign a petition of solidarity with the East Anglia mob at the centre of this scandal, plus he runs another research unit next door whose findings are in contradiction to Phil Jones’ crew.
James Delingpole has the Guardian link, and notes that if it was Dennis, that he deserves a hero’s praise.
Hear! Hear!
N.B. At the moment, all this is speculation of course. I’m not saying Dennis actually did leak the emails.
Sorry mate, you gotta go.
Pachauri is so busted, it’s almost comical.
Word for the day, Raj: Grace
H/T Nick of Western Port at Blair’s Lair.
And do note Aussie PM, Kevin Rudd, lurking in many a scene… Australia or the UN. Kev?
Er, obviously, that’s a rhetorical question.
Found this at Bolt’s Palace, who in turn found it at Watts Up With That. BTW, Bolt, why would you start blogging again on a Thursday??
LOL, sheesh it’s hard keeping up with everything sometimes. So much Intermong, such little sobriety time. It’s so embarrassing finding out now (???) that Bolta is back… and only thanks by popping over to Kae’s shack. Yes, I’m embarrassed.
But, I digress. Here’s a clip of the EU parliament being told in no uncertain terms that anthropogenic global warming is a giant scam.
PS Let’s hope Andrew keeps his forum hints and tips page going. It’s a goldmine!
| Gregoryno6 on Labor faces annihilation in ma… | |
| Carpe Jugulum on Labor faces annihilation in ma… | |
| paul on Labor faces annihilation in ma… | |
| Carpe Jugulum on Labor faces annihilation in ma… | |
| Carpe Jugulum on Labor faces annihilation in ma… | |
| paul on Labor faces annihilation in ma… | |
| Gregoryno6 on Labor faces annihilation in ma… | |
| Carpe Jugulum on Labor faces annihilation in ma… | |
| Carpe Jugulum on Understanding Vettel’s d… | |
| Carpe Jugulum on Julia Gillard calls Labor lead… | |
| elsie on Julia Gillard calls Labor lead… | |
| Sean of Deer Park on Julia Gillard calls Labor lead… | |
| mabba on Julia Gillard calls Labor lead… | |
| Minicapt on Julia Gillard calls Labor lead… | |
| Carpe Jugulum on Julia Gillard calls Labor lead… |
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |