Why Arabs lose wars
As explained by a retired US Army colonel with extensive middle east experience.
You really have to read the whole lot, but here’s a teaser.
Arab political culture is based on a high degree of social stratification, very much like that of the defunct Soviet Union and very much unlike the upwardly mobile, meritocratic, democratic United States. Arab officers do not see any value in sharing information among themselves, let alone with their men. In this they follow the example of their political leaders, who not only withhold information from their own allies, but routinely deceive them. Training in Arab armies reflects this: rather than prepare as much as possible for the multitude of improvised responsibilities that are thrown up in the chaos of battle, Arab soldiers, and their officers, are bound in the narrow functions assigned them by their hierarchy. That this renders them less effective on the battlefield, let alone places their lives at greater risk, is scarcely of concern, whereas, of course, these two issues are dominant in the American military culture, and are reflected in American military training.
Here’s that link again.
Still, the question begs: so why the quagmire in Afghanistan? Regular forces vs guerillas? Geneva Convention and politicians forcing our troops to fight with one arm tied behind their backs? Available manpower? Available firepower?
Via JM Heinrichs